Polyhedral Monism as Inquest of a Ring Determinism

                                                                                                             Ravil Kalmykov

Recognizing the uniqueness of a material reality and, simultaneously, taking on arms the enlargement of the explanation of a determinism (including its Ring version) inevitably we come to special comprehension of monism. It is necessary to consider monism not so maximally. The principled conclusion is that the reality is certainly the only one, but it is rather polyhedral and multistage, that is, is submitted by a lot of subdividings, rather independent and intricately interacting one another, which separate properties are uncovered before the explorer only under fixed aspects angle, only with fixed observation items and only via fixed techniques of supervision. So in order to receive a common view about a real complexity of the reality, it is necessary to execute a synthesis of  every possible private submissions, that is, actually, to look into each edge, to climb on each stage, and then to bridge all the obtained private material in a unified image. This is a grandiose and majestic problem for the advanced materialist - monist!

A new methodological intention on such scope and synthesis should aim the materialism in the present period at the rigorous presence in all actual topical niches of philosophical research and at rigorous participation in the conforming controversies. Moreover, the materialism, advanced in the mentioned above aspect, should head all philosophical process, collecting and synthesizing reachings of plenty of separate philosophical schools.

How do philosophy and any science actually develop? An interested and enthusiastic explorer always sees the studied subject only under the chosen point of view .Thus he, as a rule, goes out from some quite fixed world outlook platform, having armed with a certain initial cognitive intention and having before himself a certain prejudiced model. Occasionally the research itself has its fixed pragmatic purpose. So everybody is free to be carried away or not to be carried away by the final of such a research, which has an obviously expressed subjective character. Sometimes one subjective achievement becomes fashionable, sometimes another. Accordingly, the studied subject is brightly lighted up sometimes from the one side, sometimes from another. But it is necessary to remember, that each o such researches is certainly one-sided and narrow.

But the only strong point is  that similar explorers and treatments put forward by them are quite many, therefore there is an opportunity of choice of an interesting aspect, an interesting angle of the revealing the subject. Besides as a rule, the quantity of exploratory platforms corresponds to the quantity of actual, for the current day, properties of a studied subject. The acquaintance to all these platforms can give a full complex idea about it.

To the honor of common knowledge it is necessary to notice, that in spite of all the multitude of all the indicated subjective factors, only interpretations - ideas, which concentrate on the real-life natural factors which formed as we now know, by the conforming substantial causative rings, keeps in the common knowledge.

During the passing time, if not to put any barriers, all the main operational factors appear to be submitted in the researches of experts. As an example it is possible to refer to a historic fact of a    quite large scope of philosophical researches Ancient Greece, where all possible principal directions of development of thought and idea, actual to this day, have been practically presented.

The comprehension of the fact, that behind each natural factor, stressed by this or that scientific school, stands the special causative ring, allows to produce a sensible methodological attitude to doctrines and reachings of all the multitude of these separate schools. As each of these causative rings is substantial, it is necessary to estimate seriously the useful result of researches of the corresponding private school. However as every causative ring is local, and is limited in the space, time and other aspects, it is also necessary to recognize a restricted character, a scale of applicability of these results, to reject the claims of adherents of the school for their universality.

To constitute a clear idea  about the concept polyhedral monism, despite of correlation noted above, it is necessary to distinguish  real , immanently inherent properties of natural things (and causative rings disappearing behind them) from separate properties, significant for the knowledge, displayed in private researches of  the present period.   Here we’ll need the   methodology of a well-known Kant, his concept of "thing in itself" and "phenomenon". Moreover, if to understand, only a ring determinism and polyhedral monism can allow now in all one's clear beauty to reveal concepts of this great philosopher.